For the next ten minutes or so, this
poor sap with a thick Ozarks accent fired questions at me about Mayor Bloomberg
and New York City politics. His questions were clearly designed to elicit my
raging disappointment towards our three-term mayor like, “would you categorize
him as “bossy, mommy-ish, overboard or….(said quietly)…effective;” “Do you
think he should spend the rest of his term focusing on important issues or
continue the way he has been going”. He
launched into a series of questions about Bloomberg’s former, proposed and
failed regulations. I’m pretty sure I didn’t give him the answers he wanted.
Whether the topic was eliminating trans fat, tobacco taxes, smoking
restrictions or the much-maligned large sugary drink ban, I voiced my support
of our current mayor.
I should disclose that I am currently
in school for nutrition and health and I back any effort to help people curb destructive
habits such as smoking, and eating too much sugar and fat. But that’s not the
whole story. Although the poll dearly wanted me to admit that Bloomberg was
running a “Nanny State” and that I should be outraged, I wouldn’t say that. Frankly
I think we New Yorkers need a nanny.
First of all, when did nannies get
such a bad rap? Didn’t we all love Mary Poppins – after all she’s still on
Broadway. And weren’t we entranced by the crafty British caretaker on “Nanny
and the Professor” (for those of a certain middle age like me.) I thought that
nannies were stern but loving forces of good. With songs or cute tricks they
taught us to take our medicine – because that’s what we needed whether it
tasted bad or not.

Secondly, I’d like to know why
Bloomberg’s predecessor, tough guy Rudy Giuliani, was never referred to as a “Nanny”
when he tore down the triple X movie theaters that led the way to the
Disney-fication of Times Square, or when he cracked down on “quality of life”
laws such as littering and bikes on sidewalks. Weren’t these new policies also hard
pills to swallow but – in the end – for our own good? Perhaps politics has
something to do with that. Maybe only closet liberals can be nannies.
The more I thought about this, the
more I realized that New Yorkers are just a bunch of teenagers in need of a
good nanny. We tend to forget that our
government (like our parents or nannies) provides much of what we need – stuff we
couldn’t do ourselves – on a daily basis. Because things run pretty smoothly,
we don’t always think about schools, bridges and roads, our police, courts and
judges, and clean parks. In New York we even have the luxury of free garbage
pick-up and snow removal, and top notch fire fighters and emergency medical
technicians. That’s not the case in most small cities and towns where you must
rely on volunteers or pay commercial firms for those vital services. We forget that the city has created
sophisticated recycling programs, and lured new industry and millions of
tourists here year after year giving our city much needed revenue to pay for
most of these programs.
NYPD on the scene during hurricane Sandy
We take these important services,
which allow us to pursue our lives, for granted and then grow resentful about
laws and regulations we think are unnecessary. Like teenagers, we want the
warm, safe house, the food on our table and the clothes our parents provide but
cry injustice when we’re not allowed to get a tattoo or stay out late. Those rules are unfair because we think
we’re all grown up and know what’s good for us.
But whether you down donuts by the
dozen and smoke like a chimney you have to agree that there are long term
benefits for the rest of the city if Bloomberg’s “Nanny” regulations work:
fewer people will suffer from obesity, diabetes and cancer. We can all save
millions in tax dollars for unnecessary medical costs and worker absenteeism.
A good nanny knows that our
indulgences today will affect our future lives. If you don’t believe her, just
try to get a good job in your thirties with that neck tattoo peeking over your
collar.


